Archive for January, 2008
As I have aged, I have found that my grasp of the English language has become more and more limited. It has not become limited through some inability to learn, nor has it reduced due to the continual process of age and memory loss. Nay, it is as if my typing hands are often skipping parts of language beyond my the limits of my conscious self. I have a thought, or an idea, some tumultuous free form mindbanger that longs to be free of my limited cranium, and streaks off towards my fingers to be outputted in some form or fashion. But on the way, it looses proper nouns, adverbs, adjectives, and often a bit of punctuation. It is like my body, my subconscious self, has created it’s own perverted form of shorthand.
I shit you not.
Like the word punctuation in the paragraph above… it immediately came out as “punction”. Obviously punction is not what i meant to type, in fact, I know how to spell punctuation, but nonetheless, it came out punction. Intentions be damned.
It happens with parts of speech as well. I will reduce a noun and adjective down to a single word, or drop the subject altogether and end up with a small catastrophe of sentence fragments. I enjoy fragments. I don’t know why.
The feel snappy. Really snappy.
Grammar is always the first casualty in the war of translation of thought to action.
Artists can translate well. Hacks can fake it well. Then there are the rest of us, we plebes that just struggle with proper sentence structure, correct tenses, and the occasional dangling modifier.
And what really cranks my gears? Everyone thinks they are an editor. Even though they can barely write a grocery list.
Ha.
I am reading Harlan Ellison’s Shatterday right now, and English is thrust to the forefront of thought while perusing his pages. Just because he is so damn good at writing. Damn good. Makes some authors look like complete amateurs. His language is engaging, his diction superb, and the structure he uses feels like a caramel across the tongue.
I always thought Shakespeare’s sonnets were like caramel. You can’t bite into it and expect a good thing. You have to take it slowly and let it melt over your consciousness. That is the only way to truly appreciate some writing.
Wouldn’t it be nice if everything I read was like that? Hell, wouldn’t it be nice if everything I wrote was like that?
Like peasants of old, scratching at the muck, discussing who voted for the King of England (insert Monty Python quote here), our faithless users wander about the digital landscape wondering why they don’t have quantum computers that can’t do their job for them without producing some sort of error and making them coffee all at the same time.
Garbage in, Garbage out. If the user screws something up, they never take the responsibility, they blame the system.
I have a user that places a help request for a file restore. I send a email reply asking for the path and filename and the date he wants it restored from about one business hour after he places the request. He does not respond. At all.
Two days later I send another email, asking again. What a surprise, he does not respond.
I call him, asking what he needs. He replies that he cannot read my emails. (He apparently lost his eyeballs somehow? I have no idea how he is functioning in his job if he is not reading email and just sending it. They are plain text emails, no pictures, no attachments, and our mailboxes are on the same damn server.) Somehow, I get the info I need to perform the restore.
He calls back after I perform the restore. Wrong file (oh so he does read email, just not any from me). So I get a different date restored for him. No call back that anything is wrong. No email. Nothing. I assume all is well. After all I have a thousand other things to go do since I have two offices moving, a corporate re-ip underway, and a MPLS WAN to deploy.
So now, a week after all that happened, I get another ticket from his SUPERVISOR, accusing me of ignoring the request and not addressing it in a proper time frame, saying that not only did I skip the user’s request once, but TWICE.
My word, this world is full of douche bags.
Listen here, mate. Just because your employee can’t read emails, and he can’t follow through, and he can’t get shit done on his own time is not, in any sort of fashion, my fault. You do not shit on the IT guy just because you can’t manage your employees effectively. So instead, why don’t you try a little respect and get all the info in hand before you go shooting from your damn hip. Just a thought. You cannot shit on my head and expect me to thank you for the damn hat. (That is my boss’s job, not yours.)
What a tool.
I am not a big fan of westerns, per se. As a kid, I enjoyed playing cowboys and indians as much as the next white bread kid on the block, but as an adult (I spit a little whenever I say that dirty word), the whole cowboy schtick feels way overdone in the realm of movies. It is a genre so full of cliche’s, that it has transcended cliche into some uber-realm of cliche-parody-cliche’s. Oh, trust me, I know that doesn’t make much sense. And that is my point. Westerns just don’t make much sense anymore. Logically, culturally, emotionally… John Wayne would not be doing Westerns anymore if he was alive.
(Side note: Imagine a young John Wayne replacing Keanu Reeves as the young everyman in the Matrix. Discuss.)
I watched 3:10 to Yuma over the weekend. And while it was a tragic and brutal and full of unbridled amounts of tension, it also did something I was not really expecting from a remake.
It made me think.
3:10 to Yuma has bad guys, but the not bad guys you expect. It has good guys, but not the good guys that make you want to cheer. The tension is well done, well paced, and overall the movie just sucks you in. It addresses moral issues as a very real, accessible level for all of us. It doesn’t give us villains and heroes in the traditional sense (plenty of the side characters do fulfill those traditional roles), but it does give us men who seem to think, characters that actually transcend the situation they are in.
They portray more than just a western, they portray a conflict of perhaps real people and real questions about what it is to be hero and what it is to be a villain.
It all depends on the circumstances… the world is just shades of gray.
And for that alone, it was a great movie. But there was so much more that made it even better.
Russell Crowe and Christian Bale both deliver great performances, the cinematography is killer, and the climatic payoff at the end is so worth the lost fingernails chewed off through the movie.
But its not a movie I could watch twice. Just because it is brutal. And the effects team definitely shows it off with lavish.
And that’s the way it is.
My wife wakes up not feeling too well. We had a small pregnancy scare a couple weeks ago, so anything “not normal” tends to make us both freak out a little. She toughed it out like the soldier she is and I think all is well.
But then my daughter wakes up screaming. I would too, if my diaper had exploded all inside my pajamas. Those little crystals that catch the moisture had ruptured out of the top of her diaper, and she was covered in gel crystals. I resorted to dipping her in the tub to get it all off.
A bottle later, and a little cuddling, and she was back in bed, sound as a hound in a pound.
But then I was late for work and my eight o’clock meeting. So I rush in, walk into the meeting at 8:01, no caffeine in my system, and no help in the office. The main support guy is on vacation this week (bastard), and everyone resorts to me in his stead (which is ok I guess, just a bit annoying), so I had a nice queue of work sitting on my desk after my meeting.
Still no coffee.
Fucklesticks.
Go get coffee, call my wife (still good), hear the baby squeal in the background, and get back to my desk to breathe a little.
And what do I do?
Hop on the internet.
Life is grand.
Big Media sucks.
Chicken and the egg, I guess.
Media doesn’t report on Ron Paul because no one hears about him, no one hears about him because the media is not reporting on him.
From here:
Life at the Media Lab has reminded me once again that technology is most exciting when it upsets the status quo. Big-screen TVs and downloadable episodes of Late Night with Conan O’Brien are merely more attempts to control the means of distribution, something GE has been doing since the invention of the light bulb. But exploding GPS backpacks represent an alien mind-set; they are part of the growing media insurgency that is redefining news, journalism, and civic life. This technological insurgency shouldn’t surprise us: after all, it’s wrapped up in language itself, which has long defied any attempt to commodify it. Technology, as it has done through the ages, is freeing communication, and this is good news for the news. A little empathy couldn’t hurt.
Good read about how major network television (like other “Big Media”) have totally missed the bus on the relationship of society and technology.
Thanks, Mike!