Archive for June, 2010
A great read on the basics of geologic time… something I have tried to explain to my father in law when discussing not only the fossil record, but climate change. This article is stellar… especially since it does it without any of the pandering bullshit politics or agendas you get with standard discussions of climate change. Brilliant.
The geologic record suggests that climate ought not to concern us too much when we’re gazing into the energy future, not because it’s unimportant, but because it’s beyond our power to control.
Understanding the concept of geologic time and some basic science can give a new perspective on climate change and the energy future
Robert B. Laughlin is a professor of physics at Stanford University and a co-recipient of the 1998 Nobel Prize for Physics. This essay is adapted from his new book on the future of fossil fuels, which will appear next year.
I am a member for a “task force” at my company. And I am awed by how regular, predictable, and probably statistically definitive the Team’s dynamics work out to be the same as if this were school. High school, undergrad, masters, its all the same really. In any group situation where there are deliverables and a desired outcome invariably the team will fracture into the leaders, the contributors, the followers, and the slackers. A bell curve of effort where each participant falls somewhere between the first and third standard deviation from mean. Someone is going to lead and coordinate. Someone will make sure to do their part, plus some, some will just squeak by, and some will not really do anything except show up, and sometimes not even that. This taks force thing that I am a member of, the results are eerily the same.
It makes me wonder if this is really standard team psychology. If it does matter what components make up the team, and if it matters what attitudes are in place. I would think even if you had a team og one type, invariably conflicts and relationships would “push” some of those into the other roles.
My team has its roles clearly defined. Most often, I am the leader in my teams. History has proven that it is the best place to be if I want to get stuff done and get an acceptable outcome. Not this time around though. It is shocking, I think, what my role is this time round.
I think I am the slacker. I would like to make excuses and all that, but honestly, I don’t think it would change the result. I really have not contributed much since the very beginning, and I wonder if that bothers anyone. I would guess, no, that it doesn’t. Since it is a company and not a school thing, there are structures in place to support weakness and cover up faults.
As it is in any human system.